Coming soon. FilingEye is not open for sign-ups yet.

FilingEye

Ask Optik

You arrive wanting to know something about a company and you ask, without first choosing a filing. Below is the shape of the answer. Every figure in it is real.

A static preview of the interface. The chat is not yet wired to the API.

Compare gross margins across Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Meta.

Optik Computed from filing data

Meta leads on gross margin at 82.0%, roughly 35.1 points clear of the lowest of the four.

META gross margin
82.0% +0.3% vs prior
NVDA gross margin
71.1% −3.9% vs prior
MSFT gross margin
67.9% −0.9% vs prior
AAPL gross margin
46.9% +0.7% vs prior
Gross margin, most recent fiscal year

Computed from each company's filed XBRL. Meta does not tag gross profit, so its figure is revenue less cost of revenue.

The spread is structural rather than cyclical. Meta and Microsoft sell software and advertising, where the marginal cost of another unit is close to zero1. Apple sells hardware with a growing services attachment, which is what has lifted its margin for four consecutive years — from 41.8% to 46.9%2.

NVIDIA is the volatile one. Its gross margin fell to 56.9% before recovering above 70%, a swing that reflects inventory charges and mix rather than pricing power alone3.

  1. 1 10-K FY2025 Consolidated statements of income
  2. 2 10-K FY2025 Management’s discussion
  3. 3 10-K FY2026 Consolidated statements of income
Follow up

Optik answers from filings only. Where the record is silent it says so rather than guessing. Messages draw on one allowance shared with the EDGAR panel.

Next

A filing, fully analyzed

Next

Watchlist and alerts