Coming soon. FilingEye is not open for sign-ups yet.

FilingEye
Computed from filing data

The five ratio groups

Eighteen ratios in five groups, each computed from the filing and shown against its prior period.

What it measures

Profitability asks whether the business makes money: gross, operating and net margin, return on assets and return on equity.

Liquidity asks whether it can pay what is due soon: current ratio, quick ratio, and the cash position against short-term obligations.

Leverage asks who has a claim on it: debt to equity, debt to assets, and interest coverage.

Efficiency asks how hard the assets work: asset turnover, inventory turnover, and receivables days.

Growth asks what direction it is moving: revenue, earnings and asset growth against the prior comparable period.

How to read it

None of these has a universal good value. A current ratio below 1.0 is alarming for a manufacturer and ordinary for a company that collects cash before it pays suppliers — Apple runs below 1.0 and has for years.

Range What it suggests
Against its own prior period The comparison the product always shows
Against sector norms Necessary context; margins differ enormously by industry
Against an absolute rule of thumb The least reliable reading, and the most common mistake

What it does not tell you

The part most tools leave out. A score you over-trust is worse than no score.

  • Ratios are only as good as the tagging beneath them. Companies tag their XBRL differently, and some do not tag a line at all — Meta does not report a gross profit line, so it has to be derived.
  • Banks, insurers and REITs report on structures these ratios were not designed for. A debt-to-equity reading on a bank is close to meaningless without a banking-specific frame.
  • A single period can be distorted by a one-off: an acquisition, a disposal, a tax settlement or a write-down.
  • Green always means better here, which for leverage means the number went down. Direction belongs to the metric, not to the sign.